Mind the gender gap

4 mins read

Women are being put off a career in manufacturing and engineering by a perceived lack of inclusivity, with females making up fewer than 10% of the industry’s workforce. Is a more radical approach needed to redress the balance?

Currently, women account for 47% of Britain’s labour force, but just 9% of the country’s engineering workforce. The results of an extensive study on equality in engineering by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) showed that, regardless of their qualifications and background, female engineers often find themselves relegated to menial roles, such as taking notes or making coffee (http://bit.ly/1Ptwbzq). So, this 9% aren’t necessarily making a meaningful contribution to the industry.

We don’t need statistics, though, to tell us that the sector has an equality problem. A glimpse at any industry trade show, networking event or factory floor will illustrate that the industry is underperforming at attracting women and people from diverse backgrounds.

Encouragement in education
According to research by the Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET), almost half of young people believe that men are better suited to engineering careers than women. Why? Because outdated perceptions of the industry are widespread. Manufacturing and engineering have long been portrayed as ‘oily rag’ professions – but there’s so much more to them than manual labour on the factory floor.

In a report by engineering consultancy Atkins (http://bit.ly/2ylZeCE), 70% of female engineers believe that better careers advice in schools would improve gender imbalance in the industry. In compulsory education, there’s little understanding or exploration of the variety of engineering career paths available, resulting in a lack of inspiration for young women.

Today’s manufacturing industry provides a hub of creative opportunities for young women. From programming for enterprise software, to design engineering for medical devices – not to mention the opportunity to explore a plethora of emerging technologies, such as machine learning, artificial intelligence and advanced additive manufacturing.

There’s also no shortage of schemes and initiatives to encourage women to pursue a career in engineering. Apprenticeships, for example, are increasing year-on-year. Engineering apprenticeships offer women an opportunity to earn money and get a recognised qualification while they gain real-life skills. However, many businesses still aren’t taking advantage of the Apprenticeship Levy that’s available to them.
There are also fantastic links between universities and manufacturers in the UK, many of which champion their high-achieving female engineering students. While research proves that the number of women studying engineering is increasing, it’s a tragic fact that 40% of these budding female engineers will abandon the sector within five years of graduating.

It would be easy to blame oft-cited motives for women leaving the industry, such as plans to start a family. But, according to the results of the MIT study, most women leave for one simple reason: a lack of inclusivity.

Beyond the classroom
Exclusion in the workplace isn’t caused by missing staff outings or failing to befriend the production manager – the problem stems from a feeling of not belonging. The engineering sector is typically dominated by white males, and it would be thoughtless to expect anyone who doesn’t fit into this group to seamlessly integrate.

Companies need to examine what they are doing to encourage diverse recruitment and, more importantly, what happens when these recruits come on board. Corporate policies should be designed to welcome women, ethnic minorities and people with disabilities, or businesses risk losing them. Engineers are intelligent people. Without supplying them with a clear trajectory for growth and an inclusive environment, they won’t stick around for long.

Some industry leaders believe that positive discrimination (hiring only under-represented groups) is the most effective method to address gender, race and disability imbalance in engineering. Having a legal quota for employee diversity would achieve immediate results, but it won’t deliver long-term change. Starting your engineering career because of a diversity programme isn’t an empowering notion, it won’t benefit efforts for inclusivity in the workplace and, most importantly, it’s not legal.

Before having rules forced on them, companies should examine their own efforts for equality and inclusivity. Inclusivity isn’t only a box-ticking exercise, it is a way to build a better, sustainable workforce. Encouraging diversity is unarguably the moral thing to do, but many manufacturers fail to consider the commercial benefits that this increase in diversity could reap.

The benefits of a diverse workforce
Manufacturing companies can often be guilty of hiring ‘people like us’ – those from the same gender, race and general educational background. But, how can a business make informed decisions when everyone’s viewpoint is the same? Frankly, they can’t. Diversity is necessary to make creative, innovative and considerate decisions. Your customers are diverse, so the people looking after them should be too.

Ultimately, companies make better choices when their workforce is diverse, but there are other, more tangible advantages to employing from a wider talent pool.

In the construction industry, some larger projects are now setting diversity and equality requirements for their suppliers.

The High Speed 2 (HS2) rail project, for example, has aims to set new industry standards for equality and inclusion by setting a diversity specification for their tier one suppliers. If a supplier doesn’t reach this set requirement, it won’t win the contract to work on HS2.

Regional membership organisations are also taking steps to encourage diversity in the workplace. According to the Office for National Statistics, the West Midlands engineering industry has the worst female employment rate of the six combined local authorities
in the country.

To reverse this trend, industry group Made in the Midlands has recently launched its own equality and inclusivity campaign (http://bit.ly/2EBj40V).

“Low female employment rates in the Midlands industrial sector is a cause for concern,” explains Jason Pitt, chief of Made in the Midlands and the wider Made in Group. “However, engaging and attracting new people from underrepresented groups, including women and ethnic minorities, is crucial for employers wanting to improve their productivity and grow more quickly. This is why we are introducing a campaign that will encourage businesses to audit their approach to diversity and achieve a new kitemark that demonstrates their commitment to inclusivity.”

Balancing equality in manufacturing will take time and dedication from stakeholders to ensure that
the issue is made a priority. This change won’t happen overnight, but it is happening, and it is everyone’s imperative to ensure it is a positive one.